If you're a data professional, business owner, or business intelligence (BI) analyst, you know how crucial accurate data is for strategic decision-making. Data scientists spend about 60% of their time preparing the data for analysis while collecting datasets accounts for only 19% of their workload.
Every year, organizations lose around $12.9 million on average due to poor data quality. Beyond its immediate revenue impact, bad data complicates data management and affects decision-making. Therefore, any data-driven company must get the correct data and deliver it to the right people.
This article discusses the impact of poor data on business outcomes and presents strategies to improve data quality to drive growth.
Click to skip down.
Poor or bad data refers to information that is inaccurate, incomplete, inconsistent, outdated, or not properly maintained, secured, or validated. It is data not fit for its intended purpose, or lacking the quality required to support the outcomes it is being used for. Poor data can arise from various sources, including human error, system issues, data integration problems, and lack of standardized data entry processes.
Below is a breakdown of various categories of poor data.
From multinational corporations to small businesses, data quality is crucial in driving strategic initiatives, enhancing operational efficiency, and informing innovation. However, not all data is created equal. Poor or bad data often goes unseen, posing significant challenges and risks to organizations.
Since companies rely heavily on accurate and reliable data to drive their decision-making processes, poor-quality data can significantly affect even the largest corporations. When data quality is compromised, the consequences can be severe.
Let’s explore a few real-world examples of how poor data has affected big companies and resulted in million-dollar losses.
Unity Technologies, known for its real-time 3D content platform, suffered a data quality incident in Q1 2022. The inaccuracies in its Pinpointer tool caused bad data ingestion from a large customer, leading to a $110 million revenue loss. Unity's shares dropped by 37%. Its CEO Ricicitello pledged to improve data quality to regain investor confidence.
A striking example of how small data mistakes can rapidly escalate occurred at Samsung Securities. An employee accidentally fat-fingered an incorrect data value and mistakenly issued billions of shares to employees during routine dividend payments. The error resulted in 2.8 billion "ghost shares" being issued, about 30 times the total number of existing shares.
The major credit bureau Equifax faced heavy regulatory fines, lawsuits, and a massive dent in its credibility when inaccurate credit scores were generated for millions of consumers over several years. The scoring errors risked lending decisions and shook public trust in Equifax’s data practices.
Many teams struggle with maintaining a good level of data quality. Since low-quality data can result in significant business loss, understanding how to estimate these costs is crucial.
Evaluate the quantity, sources, and types of data in your system, including new entries and updates. This will allow for an accurate gauge of managed data volume, alongside considerations such as storage and management. You can take this data from audit logs or data comparison snapshots taken at different times.
Determine the percentage of your data affected by inaccuracies or incompleteness. You can get this estimation from data quality logs, data profiling, or insights gathered from interviews and survey responses conducted during the situational analysis phase.
If, for example, you discover that a significant portion of your product data is inaccurate, this signals a need for immediate action. This may involve implementing data validation processes, conducting thorough data cleansing initiatives, etc.
Measure the time and resources spent identifying, correcting, and cleansing poor-quality data. This may also include considering the costs of third-party services for data cleaning. Estimating the cost of poor data entry typically involves three categories, each with its own criteria:
These cost ranges are illustrative and may vary depending on factors such as the specific organization's circumstances, the complexity of the data, and the effectiveness of remediation efforts.
Consider the indirect costs such as lost sales opportunities due to outdated customer data or production inefficiencies like overstocking or understocking of products due to inaccurate inventory records. A relatable scenario might be a marketing campaign that fails to reach its target audience because of outdated contact information.
Implementing strategies to improve data quality is essential to ensure the integrity and reliability of organizational data.
Below is a list of a few strategies that can help you enhance your data quality.
Robust data quality and governance require scalable, intelligent data management platforms. That’s where Dataddo provides a critical advantage.
Dataddo offers a comprehensive solution for ensuring data quality, incorporating a range of built-in mechanisms to secure against inaccuracies and anomalies. With features such as an anomaly detector, filtering system, and rule-based integration triggers, Dataddo empowers users to maintain data integrity and prevent the flow of suspicious datasets downstream.
Dataddo has helped several businesses overcome data integration challenges and optimize their data processes. For instance, Livesport, a leading sports data provider, faced data integration hurdles across various sources. Despite utilizing BigQuery, they needed to streamline integration without overburdening their team. Turning to Dataddo, they found a solution for synchronizing data from diverse sources, ensuring fixed pricing and robust support.
Explore Dataddo today to enhance data quality and improve decision-making!
Connect All Your Data with Dataddo ETL, ELT, reverse ETL. Full suite of data quality features. Maintenance-free. Coding-optional interface. SOC 2 Type II certified. Predictable pricing. |